"Either-Or" squeeze (2)

Here another Either-Or squeeze:

Dealer: South Vul: n/a Scoring: MP	♠ AQ542 ♥ 5 ♦ 65 ♣ AK965
♠ 963 ♥ J43 ♦ 984 ♣ QJ43		♠ KJ87 ♥ KQ7 ♦ KQT7 ♣ T7
	♠ T ♥ AT9862 ♦ AJ32 ♣ 82

The auction went:
1♠ - 1NT!
2♣! - 2♦!
2♠ - 3♥
pass
(1NT was semi forcing; 2♣ Gazzilli; ♦ shows 8-11HCP)

This wasn't a great auction. I was sitting South and had a problem when partner showed <15HCP and (2)3+♣. I decided to just go for 3♥ and see what happens (this is less than invite, otherwise I would've started with 2♥ instead of 1NT). With the North hand I'd have rebid 3♣ instead of Gazzilli since it's 2 good suits and a perfect distribution for it.

Anyway, we got to a playable contract.

West lead ♦9 to the Queen which I ducked smoothly. ♥7 came back to T and J, and another ♦ was played to my AJ. East decided to play the T for my J.

Now I played ♥A (East dropped the King), followed by ♣AK and a ♣ ruff (East discarded ♠J). I exited a trump to East's Queen. This was the situation:

Dealer: South Vul: n/a Scoring: MP	♠ AQ5 ♥ - ♦ - ♣ 96
♠ 963 ♥ - ♦ 4 ♣ Q		♠ K87 ♥ - ♦ K7 ♣ -
	♠ T ♥ 86 ♦ A3 ♣ -

East played his ♦K but everything was already lost. I had a ♣ tenance against West and a ♦ tenance against East, so whoever held ♠K would be squeezed.

An "Either-Or" squeeze is technically a simple squeeze (against 1 opponent), but you play it like a double squeeze. Cash your 2 trumps. On the last trump you can squeeze either opponent if he holds the ♠K:

Dealer: South Vul: n/a Scoring: MP	♠ AQ ♥ - ♦ - ♣ 9
♠ K?6 ♥ - ♦ - ♣ Q		♠ K?8 ♥ - ♦ 7 ♣ -
	♠ T ♥ 6 ♦ 3 ♣ -

3♥+1 was a cold top. West should've played ♠ as soon as he won a trick to break up all communications. I don't know why he didn't.